Susie
  • Home
  • About
  • Give
  • Photos
  • Subscribe
  • Contact


Interesting Linguistics – June 24

June 24, 2019 by Susie

Thanks to everyone who posted a response to my last challenge.  You can go and check out my reply to that one as well if you’d like.

Today’s challenge is quite a bit different.  It is about Semantics, which is the meanings of words, and is taken from my Lexicography class, which is a class about making dictionaries.  Semantics is not my favorite, but you might get bored if I ONLY post about discourse stuff.  So here we go.

Bird.  What would you give as a definition of “bird?”  How do you know if something is a bird or not?

Now that might sound simple, but people have been fighting about that for a long time.  Two main camps that we talked about in class today are those who argue for “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions” and those who argue for “Prototypes.”

Those who argue for Necessary and Sufficient Conditions would say that there is a set of attributes such that all of those attributes are NECESSARY for something to be classified as a bird, and that if you list out all of those attributes it will be SUFFICIENT in narrowing down the list of “everything” to the list of just birds.  For example, having wings and having feathers may be two of those “conditions” or “attributes” that make something “bird”y.  All birds have feathers and all birds have wings.  However, though those could both be called NECESSARY for something to be a bird, they aren’t yet SUFFICIENT in narrowing down your choices of all words to just those that fit the category of “bird.”  You could, for example, have a Halloween costume with angel wings with feathers on it, and though that costume has both feathers and wings, it is not a bird. 

If you like this idea of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions, can you think of other conditions or attributes that you would need to have to describe “bird?”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Some people, though, don’t like the idea of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions, saying that it doesn’t quite work all the time.  For example, is a penguin whose feathers never came in not a bird because he doesn’t happen to have feathers?  Hmm. . . .  Or another Necessary and Sufficient Condition that we’d like to add is that a bird flies, but we all know that penguins and ostriches don’t fly.  So as much as we’d like to say that being able to fly is like a “prerequisite” to being a bird, it doesnโ€™t quite work.

That’s why these people who don’t like Necessary and Sufficient Conditions came up with a new theory, called Prototypes.  They said that there is something, take a robin for example, that is a prototypical bird.  All other birds will be somewhat like that prototypical bird, though not necessarily exactly like it, and that “family resemblance” is what makes them a bird.  So a prototypical bird would have feathers and fly, but the Prototype theory would say that it’s ok to have a bird that doesn’t have feathers or doesn’t fly, since it’s still like a prototypical bird in other ways.  It may, for example, have wings. 

These arguments go on and on, back and forth, which is why I don’t really like theories that don’t look so practical.  But based on this very brief overview, what do you think?  What makes a bird a bird?

(PS. Can you see the pelican in the picture?  It’s the best picture of a bird that I could find from my recent PGA trip, though we saw so many cool ones!  This picture is taken in Guinea-Bissau.)

Filed Under: Uncategorized

More Posts:

« Interesting Linguistics – June 15
Interesting Linguistics – June 29 »

Comments

  1. Larry McCall says

    June 26, 2019 at 4:36 pm

    Susie
    Tried to see what you are doing, but the question you ask is above and beyond me.
    How and what does Ethnos 360 having you doing?

  2. Stephen Narwold says

    June 26, 2019 at 4:04 pm

    To me, due to my personality type, the “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions” approach seems correct. If you come up with the right conditions, you will have a perfect way of separating birds from not-birds.

    BUT, as a person who’s lived my life trying to get the real world to fit into a set of clearly defined boundaries, I know that it’s never that clean. One plus one is two, and two is twice as much as one. If I pick two apples, I will have twice as much food as if I pick only one… except that I won’t, because they are different sizes. And while their sizes, densities, weights, etc. can be measured, the real world apple will never be accurately written down because our measurements aren’t precise enough.

    Ok, so we weren’t talking about apples, but coming back to defining birds, the prototype method. It’s less precise, which makes it, in my opinion, a better match for the real world. Airplanes are sometimes referred to as birds, and if we use the prototype method we can say “Yeah, a plane is like a robin,” and be correct. BUT, if the group we are a part of doesn’t refer to Planes as birds, then we just say “There are too many differences.” It leaves a fuzzy line which the real world (especially language) seems to be full of.

  3. Shar says

    June 26, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    Just wow and wow ๐Ÿ™‚ so much goes into all this language analysis! I am boggled just reading your posts! the English language I see from our grandkids posts is getting condensed down to emojis and gifs and pictures…I wonder if they will need their own Bible translation in those soon. Anyway it all keeps me praying that God’s Word will be available in whatever languages people will read and comprehend best with the Holy Spirit speaking to their hearts! Praying all your needs be supplied, Susie, and joy for you!

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • January 2011
  • August 2010
  • About
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Give
  • Photos
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Disclaimer: This personal ministry website is provided by Ethnos360 as a courtesy to its members. Ethnos360 makes no warranty regarding the accuracy of the information on these pages. Opinions expressed are provided by members in good faith, but are entirely those of the member and do not necessarily represent policy, doctrinal position, or opinions of Ethnos360. If you encounter information that you consider questionable, please e-mail the Ethnos360 web team.

Susie

© Copyright 2022 Ethnos360. All rights reserved.

Log In

  • 